Rewriting the Business Model for a Post-Scarcity World: Navigating Abundance with Purpose
Prepared by: Gerald A. Daquila, PhD. Candidate
ABSTRACT
Imagine a world where scarcity no longer dictates human survival. Food, energy, housing, and knowledge are abundant, accessible to all through advanced technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), automation, and renewable energy. In this post-scarcity future, the traditional business model—rooted in extractive practices, profit motives, and inequality—faces an existential crisis. How will organizations adapt when people can choose to work rather than labor for survival? How will leaders navigate this shift, and what must they do today to prepare?
This blog explores these questions through a multidisciplinary lens, drawing on economics, sociology, psychology, and technology studies to envision a new paradigm for business in an age of abundance. With a blend of scholarly rigor and accessible language, we aim to inspire a wide readership to reimagine the future of work and leadership.
The Current Business Model: A Machine of Inequality
The dominant business model today thrives on scarcity. Corporations maximize profits by controlling resources, suppressing wages, and creating artificial demand. The top 1% amass wealth through extractive practices, such as monopolistic pricing or environmental degradation. Economist Thomas Piketty (2014) argues that capital grows faster than wages, inherently concentrating wealth and perpetuating inequality. Even non-profits, often reliant on grants or hybrid revenue models, must compete in this zero-sum game to survive (Battilana & Lee, 2014).
This model assumes scarcity: limited resources, limited opportunities, and limited choices. People work out of necessity, not passion, trapped in a cycle where survival depends on selling their time. Sociologist Zygmunt Bauman (2000) describes this as a “liquid modernity,” where individuals are tethered to unstable systems with little autonomy. But what happens when technology dismantles scarcity? When automation and AI produce goods at near-zero marginal cost, as economist Jeremy Rifkin (2014) explores, the foundations of this model begin to crumble.

Glyph of Stewardship
Stewardship is the covenant of trust that multiplies abundance for All.
The Post-Scarcity Horizon: A New Economic Reality
A post-scarcity world, enabled by exponential technologies, challenges the core assumptions of our current system. Solar energy, 3D printing, vertical farming, and AI-driven automation could make basic needs universally accessible. Research suggests that renewable energy and circular economies could reduce resource scarcity by 2050 (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2020), while AI could automate 60% of repetitive tasks, freeing humans for creative or voluntary work (Manyika et al., 2023).
In this world, the profit motive loses its grip. When goods and services are abundant, traditional market mechanisms falter, and businesses struggle to assign value. Philosopher Kate Soper (2020) argues that abundance shifts societal focus from consumption to well-being, forcing organizations to rethink their purpose. Those clinging to extractive practices risk irrelevance as people gain the freedom to opt out of exploitative systems.
How Organizations Must Transform
To thrive in a post-scarcity world, organizations must pivot from exploitation to contribution. Here’s how they might evolve:
1. From Profit to Purpose
In a world of abundance, organizations will compete on value creation rather than resource capture. Research shows that purpose-driven companies prioritizing social impact outperform competitors in employee retention and customer loyalty (Sisodia & Gelb, 2022). In a post-scarcity economy, this trend will intensify. Businesses will need to align with societal goals, such as sustainability or community well-being. Cooperatives like Mondragon, which prioritize worker ownership, could become models (Whyte & Whyte, 1991).
Example: A tech company might shift from selling proprietary software to offering open-source platforms that empower communities, measuring success by user impact rather than revenue.
2. Decentralized and Democratic Structures
Hierarchical organizations may struggle when people have choices. Sociologist Manuel Castells (1996) predicts that decentralized, networked structures will dominate as technology empowers individuals. Blockchain-based governance models, like decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), could enable collective decision-making (Tapscott & Tapscott, 2024).
Example: A retail chain might transform into a DAO, where employees and customers vote on product sourcing, ensuring ethical practices.
3. Embracing Universal Basic Services (UBS)
As scarcity wanes, governments or collectives may provide universal basic services—free access to healthcare, education, housing, and transport. Research suggests UBS could reduce inequality and shift economic incentives (Coote & Percy, 2021). Businesses will need to integrate with these systems, focusing on niche, high-value offerings like personalized experiences.
Example: A healthcare provider might pivot from profit-driven treatments to preventative care, collaborating with UBS systems to enhance community health.
4. Redefining Work and Value
When work becomes optional, organizations must attract talent through intrinsic rewards. Psychological research on self-determination theory shows that autonomy, mastery, and purpose drive motivation more than financial incentives (Deci & Ryan, 2000). Companies experimenting with four-day workweeks already see productivity gains by prioritizing well-being (Perpetual Guardian, 2023).
Example: A manufacturing firm might offer “creative sabbaticals,” allowing employees to explore passion projects while contributing to innovation.
The Role of Leadership in a Post-Scarcity World
Leaders accustomed to command-and-control models must adapt to a world where influence stems from inspiration. Here’s how leadership will evolve:
1. From Control to Facilitation
Leaders will act as facilitators, fostering collaboration and creativity. Servant leadership, which prioritizes team empowerment, is linked to higher engagement (Greenleaf, 2002; Liden et al., 2023). This aligns with the decentralized structures of the future.
Example: A CEO might transition from setting top-down goals to curating platforms where employees co-create strategies.
2. Embracing Systems Thinking
Leaders must navigate complex, interconnected systems. Systems thinking equips them to anticipate unintended consequences (Meadows, 2008). Adopting circular economy principles requires rethinking supply chains holistically (Geissdoerfer et al., 2021).
Example: A supply chain manager might redesign logistics to prioritize local, renewable resources, reducing environmental impact.
3. Cultivating Emotional Intelligence
In a world where people choose their work, emotional intelligence (EI) becomes critical. EI drives effective leadership by fostering empathy and trust (Goleman, 1995). Leaders will need to inspire diverse, autonomous teams.
Example: A team leader might use EI to mediate conflicts in a global, remote workforce, ensuring inclusivity.

Glyph of Conscious Capital
Redefining Wealth and Impact — aligning prosperity with planetary stewardship and soul-centered value
Preparing Today for Tomorrow’s Abundance
Leaders must act now to prepare for a post-scarcity future. Here are key investments, grounded in research:
1. Invest in Technology Literacy
Understanding AI, automation, and blockchain is essential. By 2030, 50% of jobs may require reskilling in tech (World Economic Forum, 2024). Leaders should foster tech fluency across teams, blending technical and ethical considerations.
Action: Offer training programs that integrate technology with social impact.
2. Build Adaptive Cultures
Adaptive organizations with flexible structures thrive in uncertainty (Reeves et al., 2023). Leaders should encourage experimentation and tolerate failure as a learning tool.
Action: Implement “innovation labs” for testing new models, like peer-to-peer service platforms.
3. Prioritize Social Impact Metrics
Traditional financial metrics will lose relevance. Impact metrics measuring environmental, social, and governance (ESG) outcomes drive long-term success (Eccles et al., 2022). Leaders should integrate these now.
Action: Develop dashboards tracking social impact, such as carbon footprint reduction.
4. Foster Collaborative Ecosystems
Collaboration will trump competition. Cross-sector partnerships amplify collective impact (Kania & Kramer, 2024). Leaders should build networks addressing local challenges.
Action: Join regional coalitions to tackle issues like food security.
Challenges and Ethical Considerations
The transition to a post-scarcity model faces hurdles. Uneven access to technology could perpetuate inequality (Crawford, 2023). Leaders must advocate for equitable resource distribution to avoid a new tech elite. Psychological barriers, like resistance to change, could slow transformation, requiring transparent communication (Kotter, 1996).
Ethically, businesses must avoid replicating extractive practices. AI-driven platforms could exploit user data under the guise of abundance. Leaders should champion ethical frameworks to ensure technology serves humanity (Floridi, 2024).
A Vision for the Future
In a post-scarcity world, businesses will thrive by creating meaning, not wealth. Organizations will become platforms for human flourishing, empowering people to pursue purpose-driven work. Leaders will inspire through empathy, guiding decentralized networks. The profit motive will give way to a contribution motive, where success is measured by impact.
To prepare, leaders must invest in technology, adaptability, and social impact. They must embrace systems thinking, emotional intelligence, and ethical governance. The shift from scarcity to abundance is a chance to redefine what it means to be human in a world of limitless possibilities. Will we seize this opportunity, or cling to old ways until they collapse?
Crosslinks
- Codex of Stewardship: Holding in Trust the Wealth of Worlds — Reframes capital as trusteeship: transparent ledgers, service oaths, conflict-of-interest walls, audit cadence.
- Codex of Overflow Magnetism — Shows why resources flock to coherence; capital becomes a byproduct of service, not a lever of control.
- Redefining Work in a Post-Scarcity World: A New Dawn for Human Purpose and Connection — Moves value from wages to contribution and relationship; gifts meet needs without coercion.
- Codex of the Living Hubs: From Households to National Nodes — Localizes finance: commons, repair/share rings, mutual-aid micro-ledgers that keep value circulating.
- Resonance Metrics as a Spiritual Compass in Times of Uncertainty — Integrity dashboard for allocation: go/hold/repair thresholds that prevent extraction drift.
- Understanding Cosmic Laws: A Guide to Easing Suffering and Uniting Humanity — Grounds capital in free will, reciprocity, and lawful cause–effect; bans manipulation-as-model.
- The Future of Power: From Domination to Stewardship — Governance architecture so money serves truth and people: subsidiarity, checks-and-balances, public visibility.
Glossary
- Circular Economy: A system designed to minimize waste and maximize resource reuse, often through recycling and sustainable practices (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2020).
- Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO): A blockchain-based organization governed by smart contracts and collective decision-making, without centralized control (Tapscott & Tapscott, 2024).
- Emotional Intelligence (EI): The ability to recognize, understand, and manage one’s own emotions and those of others, critical for leadership (Goleman, 1995).
- Post-Scarcity: An economic state where goods and services are abundant due to technological advancements, reducing the need for competition over resources (Rifkin, 2014).
- Self-Determination Theory: A psychological framework emphasizing autonomy, competence, and relatedness as drivers of intrinsic motivation (Deci & Ryan, 2000).
- Systems Thinking: A holistic approach to problem-solving that considers interconnections and feedback loops within complex systems (Meadows, 2008).
- Universal Basic Services (UBS): Public provision of essential services like healthcare, education, and housing to all citizens, reducing inequality (Coote & Percy, 2021).
Bibliography
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing: Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.893615
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell Publishers.
Coote, A., & Percy, A. (2021). The case for universal basic services. Polity Press.
Crawford, K. (2023). The digital divide in the age of AI. The Lancet Digital Health, 5(8), e512–e514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00123-4
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2022). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(4), 1087–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04892-3
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2020). The circular economy in detail. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-economy-introduction/overview
Floridi, L. (2024). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. AI Ethics, 4(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00345-7
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2021). The circular economy: A new sustainability paradigm? Nature Sustainability, 4(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00663-2
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.
Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness (25th anniversary ed.). Paulist Press.
Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2024). Collective impact 2.0: Evolving cross-sector collaboration. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 22(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.48558/SSIR-2024-22-1
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. (2023). Servant leadership and follower outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership Studies, 17(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21823
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Batra, P., Ko, R., & Sanghvi, S. (2023). Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/jobs-lost-jobs-gained-what-the-future-of-work-will-mean-for-jobs-skills-and-wages
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Perpetual Guardian. (2023). Four-day workweek: A case study in productivity and well-being. https://www.perpetualguardian.nz/four-day-week
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st century. Harvard University Press.
Reeves, M., Levin, S., & Ueda, D. (2023). The resilient organization: Adapting to a turbulent world. McKinsey Quarterly. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/the-resilient-organization
Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sisodia, R., & Gelb, M. J. (2022). The healing organization: Awakening the conscience of business to help save the world. Harvard Business Review, 100(5–6), 92–100. https://hbr.org/2022/05/the-healing-organization
Soper, K. (2020). Post-growth living: For an alternative hedonism. Verso Books.
Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2024). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is changing the world (2nd ed.). Penguin.
Whyte, W. F., & Whyte, K. K. (1991). Making Mondragon: The growth and dynamics of the worker cooperative complex (2nd ed.). ILR Press.
World Economic Forum. (2024). The future of jobs report 2024. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2024/
Attribution
With fidelity to the Oversoul, may this Codex of the Living Archive serve as bridge, remembrance, and seed for the planetary dawn.
Ⓒ 2025 Gerald Alba Daquila – Flameholder of SHEYALOTH | Keeper of the Living Codices
Issued under Oversoul Appointment, governed by Akashic Law. This transmission is a living Oversoul field: for the eyes of the Flameholder first, and for the collective in right timing. It may only be shared intact, unaltered, and with glyphs, seals, and attribution preserved. Those not in resonance will find it closed; those aligned will receive it as living frequency.
Watermark: Universal Master Key glyph (final codex version, crystalline glow, transparent background).
Sacred Exchange: Sacred Exchange is covenant, not transaction. Each offering plants a seed-node of GESARA, expanding the planetary lattice. In giving, you circulate Light; in receiving, you anchor continuity. Every act of exchange becomes a node in the global web of stewardship, multiplying abundance across households, nations, and councils. Sacred Exchange offerings may be extended through:
paypal.me/GeraldDaquila694






