Category: Law of One
-
The Psychology of Evil and the Soul’s Journey: Intersections of Trauma, Choice, and Transformation
Reconciling the Paradox of Evil in a Loving Universe Through Esoteric Wisdom and Psychological Insights
Prepared by: Gerald A. Daquila, PhD. Candidate
11–16 minutesABSTRACT
This dissertation explores the psychology of evil, the motivations behind a soul’s choice to harm others, and the metaphysical implications of such choices within the framework of esoteric teachings, particularly the Law of One. It addresses why a loving God permits evil, the consequences for souls that fail to evolve beyond harmful tendencies, and the dynamics of soul choice between service to self and service to others.
Drawing on psychology, philosophy, theology, and esoteric traditions, the study integrates insights from cognitive science, Jungian psychology, trauma research, and spiritual texts to offer a cohesive narrative. The analysis posits that evil arises from free will and distorted perceptions of separation, with souls navigating a cosmic journey of growth through repeated opportunities for choice.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- The Enigma of Evil
- Objectives and Scope
- Methodology and Framework
- The Psychology of Evil
- Defining Evil: Psychological and Philosophical Perspectives
- Motivations for Harm: Ego, Trauma, and Separation
- Cognitive and Social Mechanisms
- The Metaphysics of Evil in Esoteric Traditions
- The Law of One: Free Will and Polarity
- Why a Loving God Allows Evil
- The Role of Soul Choice: Service to Self vs. Service to Others
- Consequences of the “Evil Mission”
- The Concept of Spiritual Graduation
- The Hurdle Rate: Measuring Soul Evolution
- What Happens to Souls That “Fail”?
- The Dynamics of Soul Choice
- Service to Self vs. Service to Others
- The Role of Karma and Reincarnation
- Opportunities for Redemption and Growth
- Multidisciplinary Insights
- Psychological Perspectives: Jung, Trauma, and Moral Development
- Philosophical and Theological Lenses
- Esoteric and Scientific Synergy
- Conclusion
- Reconciling Evil with a Loving Universe
- Implications for Personal and Collective Evolution
- Glossary
- Bibliography
1. Introduction
The Enigma of Evil
Why do some individuals cause harm, and what drives a soul to choose such a path? Why does a loving, omnipotent God allow suffering and malevolence to persist? These questions have haunted humanity across cultures and epochs, from ancient scriptures to modern psychological studies.
This dissertation seeks to unravel the psychology of evil and the metaphysical dynamics of soul choice, using the Law of One—a channeled esoteric text—as a primary lens, supplemented by psychological, philosophical, and theological perspectives.
Objectives and Scope
This study aims to:
- Explore the psychological motivations behind harmful actions.
- Examine why a loving God permits evil, according to esoteric and theological frameworks.
- Analyze the consequences for souls that fail to evolve beyond harmful tendencies.
- Investigate the dynamics of soul choice between service to self and service to others.
- Synthesize esoteric wisdom with empirical research for a holistic understanding.
The scope encompasses the Law of One, related esoteric works (e.g., Seth Material, A Course in Miracles), and multidisciplinary research from psychology, philosophy, and theology. The narrative balances accessibility for a broad audience with scholarly rigor, weaving left-brain logic with right-brain intuition.
Methodology and Framework
The methodology integrates:
- Esoteric Analysis: Drawing on the Law of One and similar texts to frame evil and soul choice metaphysically.
- Psychological Research: Leveraging cognitive science, trauma studies, and Jungian psychology to explain harmful behaviors.
- Philosophical and Theological Inquiry: Exploring free will, theodicy, and moral development.
- Narrative Synthesis: Crafting a cohesive story that bridges spiritual and empirical insights.
The Law of One posits that all is one infinite Creator, and souls choose paths of service to self (STS) or service to others (STO) to evolve through free will. This framework anchors the dissertation, with research grounding the narrative in observable phenomena.
Glyph of the Seer
Sees truly, speaks gently
2. The Psychology of Evil
Defining Evil: Psychological and Philosophical Perspectives
Evil is often defined as intentional harm to others, rooted in malice, indifference, or distorted intent. Philosophically, evil is a privation of good (privatio boni), as per Augustine (Augustine, 1960). Psychologically, it manifests through behaviors like aggression, manipulation, or cruelty. Zimbardo (2007) describes evil as the exercise of power to harm, oppress, or destroy, often amplified by situational factors.
Motivations for Harm: Ego, Trauma, and Separation
Why would a soul choose to harm others? Psychological research points to several drivers:
- Ego and Narcissism: Narcissistic traits, such as grandiosity and lack of empathy, correlate with harmful behaviors (Baumeister, 1997). The ego’s need for control or superiority can override moral constraints.
- Trauma and Pain: Unresolved trauma often fuels aggression. Bessel van der Kolk (2014) notes that trauma disrupts emotional regulation, leading to cycles of harm as individuals project pain onto others.
- Perception of Separation: The Law of One suggests that evil stems from a belief in separation from the infinite Creator (Ra, 1984). This distortion fosters fear, greed, and power-seeking, as individuals prioritize self over others.
Cognitive and Social Mechanisms
Cognitive biases and social dynamics amplify harmful choices:
- Dehumanization: Viewing others as “less than” enables cruelty, as seen in Milgram’s obedience experiments (Milgram, 1963).
- Group Dynamics: Conformity and groupthink, as in Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment, can normalize harm (Zimbardo, 2007).
- Moral Disengagement: Bandura (1999) explains how individuals rationalize harmful actions through mechanisms like blaming victims or minimizing consequences.
These factors suggest that evil is not a fixed trait but a dynamic interplay of individual, situational, and spiritual influences.
3. The Metaphysics of Evil in Esoteric Traditions
The Law of One: Free Will and Polarity
The Law of One, channeled by Carla Rueckert, posits that the universe is a singular infinite Creator, and souls are fragments of this unity exploring free will (Ra, 1984). Evil arises from the distortion of free will, where souls choose the path of service to self (STS), seeking power over others, over service to others (STO), which prioritizes love and unity. This polarity is essential for spiritual growth, as it allows souls to learn through contrast.
Why a Loving God Allows Evil
The problem of evil—why a loving, omnipotent God permits suffering—has been debated for centuries. In the Law of One, evil is a byproduct of free will, which is sacred because it enables souls to choose their path (Ra, 1984). Without the option to harm, growth through choice would be impossible. Theologically, this aligns with Plantinga’s free will defense, which argues that genuine freedom requires the possibility of evil (Plantinga, 1974).
Esoterically, suffering serves as a catalyst for evolution. The Seth Material suggests that challenges, including evil, are opportunities for souls to develop compassion and wisdom (Roberts, 1972). A loving God allows evil not out of indifference but to honor free will and facilitate growth.
The Role of Soul Choice: Service to Self vs. Service to Others
The Law of One describes two primary paths:
- Service to Self (STS): Souls prioritize personal power, control, or gain, often at others’ expense. This path requires 95% purity of intent to “graduate” to higher densities (Ra, 1984).
- Service to Others (STO): Souls prioritize love, compassion, and unity, requiring at least 51% purity to advance. STO aligns with the Creator’s essence of love/light.
Souls choose these paths consciously or unconsciously, influenced by incarnational lessons, karma, and free will.
4. Consequences of the “Evil Mission”
The Concept of Spiritual Graduation
In the Law of One, spiritual evolution occurs through densities levels, with third density (our current reality) being the realm of choice between STS and STO (Ra, 1984). Graduation to fourth density requires aligning with one path. STS souls must achieve near-total self-focus, while STO souls need a majority focus on others.
The Hurdle Rate: Measuring Soul Evolution
The “hurdle rate” refers to the threshold for advancing densities:
- STS: 95% purity, reflecting intense commitment to self-interest.
- STO: 51% purity, reflecting a balanced leaning toward love and service.
These percentages are metaphorical, representing energetic alignment rather than literal metrics. Souls are assessed by their higher self and guides at the end of an incarnation (Ra, 1984).
What Happens to Souls That “Fail”?
Souls that fail to meet either threshold remain in third density, repeating incarnations to refine their choices. The Law of One emphasizes that there is no eternal punishment; instead, “failure” is a delay in progression, offering further opportunities for learning (Ra, 1984). For example, an STS soul that harms others but lacks sufficient purity may reincarnate to face karmic consequences, such as experiencing the pain they inflicted.
Where Does the Soul Go?
Non-graduating souls reincarnate in third-density environments suited to their lessons. The Tibetan Book of the Dead describes bardo states where souls reflect before choosing new incarnations (Evans-Wentz, 1927). The Law of One suggests that souls are guided to circumstances that maximize growth, whether through STS or STO lessons (Ra, 1984).
Is the Soul Given Another Chance?
Yes, souls are given infinite chances. The Law of One and A Course in Miracles emphasize that time is an illusion, and the Creator’s love ensures endless opportunities for redemption (Schucman, 1976). Souls may shift from STS to STO or vice versa across lifetimes, guided by karma and free will.
Glyph of Shadow and Ascent
Through trauma and choice, the soul transforms.
5. The Dynamics of Soul Choice
Service to Self vs. Service to Others
The choice between STS and STO is the crux of third-density evolution. STS souls seek control, viewing others as tools for gain, while STO souls seek unity, seeing others as extensions of the self. Jung’s concept of the shadow aligns with STS tendencies, where unintegrated fears manifest as harmful behaviors (Jung, 1964). Conversely, STO reflects the archetype of the Self, integrating love and compassion.
The Role of Karma and Reincarnation
Karma, as described in the Law of One and Buddhist texts, is the balancing mechanism for soul choices (Ra, 1984; Dalai Lama, 1997). Harmful actions create karmic debts, requiring future incarnations to resolve. For example, a soul that harms may experience victimhood to learn empathy. Reincarnation provides a framework for souls to refine their polarity through repeated choices.
Opportunities for Redemption and Growth
Esoteric traditions emphasize redemption. A Course in Miracles teaches that every choice can be corrected through forgiveness and love (Schucman, 1976). Even deeply STS souls, like historical tyrants, are not condemned but offered new incarnations to shift toward STO. The Law of One notes that advanced STS entities, like those in fourth density, may eventually transition to STO, as all paths ultimately reunite with the Creator (Ra, 1984).
6. Multidisciplinary Insights
Psychological Perspectives: Jung, Trauma, and Moral Development
Jungian psychology offers a lens for understanding evil as the shadow—unconscious aspects of the psyche that, when unintegrated, manifest as destructive behaviors (Jung, 1964). Trauma research complements this, showing how early wounds can distort moral development (van der Kolk, 2014). Kohlberg’s stages of moral development suggest that individuals stuck in pre-conventional stages may prioritize self-interest, aligning with STS tendencies (Kohlberg, 1981).
Philosophical and Theological Lenses
Philosophically, evil is a problem of free will and meaning. Leibniz’s “best of all possible worlds” aligns with the Law of One, suggesting that evil serves a purpose in soul growth (Leibniz, 1710). Theologically, process theology posits that God co-creates with the universe, allowing evil as part of dynamic evolution (Whitehead, 1929).
Esoteric and Scientific Synergy
Quantum physics and consciousness research hint at a unified reality, supporting the Law of One’s view of oneness (Bohm, 1980). Studies on near-death experiences (NDEs) reveal themes of life review and karmic learning, aligning with esoteric views of soul evolution (Moody, 1975).
7. Conclusion
Reconciling Evil with a Loving Universe
Evil, as explored through the Law of One and multidisciplinary lenses, is not an aberration but a necessary aspect of free will and spiritual growth. Souls choose harm due to distorted perceptions of separation, driven by psychological, social, and karmic factors. A loving God permits evil to honor free will, providing infinite opportunities for redemption. Souls that fail to graduate reincarnate, guided toward growth, with no ultimate failure.
Implications for Personal and Collective Evolution
Understanding evil as a choice within a loving universe empowers individuals to integrate their shadows, choose service to others, and contribute to collective healing. By blending esoteric wisdom with psychological and philosophical insights, we see evil not as an endpoint but as a catalyst for love, unity, and evolution.
Crosslinks
- Understanding Cosmic Laws: A Guide to Easing Suffering and Uniting Humanity — Places “evil” inside lawful cause–effect, consent, and polarity stewardship; frames justice as restorative balance.
- Mapping the Soul’s Journey: A 360-Degree View of Life, Death, and the Afterlife — Uses life-review logic to convert shadow into vows, amends, and embodied reorientation.
- Understanding Shame: A Multi-Disciplinary Exploration of Its Origins, Morphology, and Resolution — Unfreezes identity so repair becomes possible; moves from “I am bad” to “I did harm.”
- The Weight of Guilt: A Multidisciplinary Exploration of Its Origins, Morphology, and Pathways to Resolution — Turns guilt into clean repair (truth + amends) instead of self-punishment or projection.
8. Glossary
- Density: A level of spiritual evolution in the Law of One, with third density being the realm of choice.
- Service to Self (STS): A path prioritizing personal gain, often at others’ expense.
- Service to Others (STO): A path prioritizing love and unity with others.
- Karma:The energetic consequence of actions, balancing soul choices across incarnations.
- Free Will: The ability to choose one’s path, central to soul evolution in esoteric traditions.
- Shadow: Jung’s term for unconscious aspects of the psyche that can manifest as harmful behaviors.
9. Bibliography
Augustine, St. (1960). The confessions of St. Augustine (J. K. Ryan, Trans.). Image Books.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Evil: Inside human violence and cruelty. W. H. Freeman.
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge.
Dalai Lama. (1997). The four noble truths. Thorsons.
Evans-Wentz, W. Y. (Ed.). (1927). The Tibetan book of the dead. Oxford University Press.
Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and his symbols. Doubleday.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. Harper & Row.
Leibniz, G. W. (1710). Theodicy: Essays on the goodness of God, the freedom of man, and the origin of evil. Routledge (1951 edition).
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
Moody, R. A. (1975). Life after life. Mockingbird Books.
Plantinga, A. (1974). The nature of necessity. Oxford University Press.
Ra. (1984). The Ra material: An ancient astronaut speaks (The Law of One, Book 1) (D. Elkins, C. Rueckert, & J. A. McCarty, Eds.). L/L Research.
Roberts, J. (1972). The Seth material. Prentice-Hall.
Schucman, H. (1976). A course in miracles. Foundation for Inner Peace.
van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality. Macmillan.
Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. Random House.
Attribution
With fidelity to the Oversoul, may this work serve as bridge, remembrance, and seed for the planetary dawn.
Ⓒ 2025–2026 Gerald Alba Daquila
Flameholder of SHEYALOTH · Keeper of the Living Codices
All rights reserved.This material originates within the field of the Living Codex and is stewarded under Oversoul Appointment. It may be shared only in its complete and unaltered form, with all glyphs, seals, and attribution preserved.
This work is offered for personal reflection and sovereign discernment. It does not constitute a required belief system, formal doctrine, or institutional program.
Digital Edition Release: 2026
Lineage Marker: Universal Master Key (UMK) Codex FieldSacred Exchange & Access
Sacred Exchange is Overflow made visible.
In Oversoul stewardship, giving is circulation, not loss. Support for this work sustains the continued writing, preservation, and public availability of the Living Codices.
This material may be accessed through multiple pathways:
• Free online reading within the Living Archive
• Individual digital editions (e.g., Payhip releases)
• Subscription-based stewardship accessPaid editions support long-term custodianship, digital hosting, and future transmissions. Free access remains part of the archive’s mission.
Sacred Exchange offerings may be extended through:
paypal.me/GeraldDaquila694
www.geralddaquila.com - Introduction
-
From I to We: The Ego’s Journey into Oneness
A Multidisciplinary Exploration of Ego’s Evolution and Its Impact on Personality Models and Societal Structures
Prepared by: Gerald A. Daquila, PhD. Candidate
9–14 minutesABSTRACT
This investigation explores the concept of the ego, its psychological and evolutionary purpose, and its potential transformation in a world characterized by unity consciousness and abundance. Drawing from psychoanalytic theory, cognitive science, sociology, and spiritual philosophy, the study examines the ego’s role as a survival mechanism in scarcity-driven environments and its adaptive functions in shaping personality and social behavior.
As societies shift toward unity consciousness—a state of interconnected awareness—and abundance, where resources and opportunities are plentiful, the ego may not disappear but transform, integrating with a collective sense of self. This shift challenges existing personality models, such as Freud’s tripartite structure or trait-based frameworks, and redefines societal structures toward cooperation and shared purpose. The investigation balances analytical rigor with intuitive insights, offering a cohesive narrative for a broad audience. A glossary and APA-formatted bibliography ground the discussion in scholarly research, ensuring accessibility without sacrificing depth.
Introduction: What Is the Ego?
The ego, a term central to Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory, is often misconstrued as mere self-centeredness. In reality, it is the conscious, organizing part of the psyche that mediates between our instinctual drives (id), moral conscience (superego), and external reality (Freud, 1923/1961). It’s the “self” we experience when making decisions, planning, or navigating social interactions. Beyond psychology, the ego is a survival tool shaped by evolution, culture, and environment.
What is the ego’s purpose, and how might it evolve in a world where scarcity is replaced by abundance and individual identity merges with unity consciousness? This investigation weaves together psychology, sociology, neuroscience, and spiritual philosophy to explore these questions, envisioning a transformed society where the ego adapts to new realities.
The Glyph of the Bridgewalker
The One Who Holds Both Shores
The Purpose of the Ego: A Survival Tool in a Scarcity Environment
The ego’s primary role is to ensure survival in a world of limited resources. Evolutionarily, it developed to help humans navigate scarcity-driven environments where competition for food, shelter, and mates was critical (Buss, 2019). The ego organizes sensory input, regulates impulses, and employs defense mechanisms like denial or projection to manage anxiety (Freud, A., 1936). For instance, a worker prioritizing long-term career goals over immediate desires, like leisure, showcases the ego’s ability to focus on survival-oriented objectives (Rappaport, 1959).
Psychologically, the ego creates a sense of individuality, distinguishing “me” from “others.” This separation was vital in scarcity environments, where asserting one’s needs—claiming resources as “mine”—ensured survival (Gusnard, 2017). Sociologically, the ego reinforces hierarchies and competition, shaping social structures around individual achievement and status (Pollan, 2010). Spiritually, however, this separation can foster isolation, as the ego clings to a distinct “I” apart from the collective (Bourgeault, 2016).
In a scarcity-driven world, the ego’s purpose is evident: it enables survival by prioritizing personal needs, defending against threats, and navigating social dynamics. But what happens when scarcity gives way to abundance and separation dissolves into unity consciousness?
Glyph of From I to We
The Ego’s Journey into Oneness — dissolving separation into unity, weaving the self into the greater whole
Unity Consciousness and Abundance: A New Context for the Ego
Unity Consciousness Defined: Unity consciousness is a state of awareness where individuals perceive themselves as interconnected with all beings, transcending the ego’s sense of separateness (Bourgeault, 2016). It emphasizes harmony, empathy, and collective well-being over individual gain.
Abundance Mindset: An abundance mindset assumes resources, opportunities, and possibilities are limitless, contrasting with the scarcity mindset’s fear of loss, which drives competition and hoarding (Castrillon, 2020).
In a world of unity consciousness and abundance, the ego’s traditional role is disrupted. Without scarcity, the need to compete or defend resources diminishes. Without separation, the ego’s focus on “I” versus “others” becomes less relevant. Does the ego vanish in this context, or does it transform?
Transformation, Not Disappearance
Research and philosophical perspectives suggest the ego evolves rather than disappears. Psychoanalytic ego psychology posits that the ego is a dynamic system capable of adapting to new contexts (Hartmann, 1958). In an abundant, interconnected world, the ego could shift from a defensive, self-preserving entity to a facilitative one, integrating individual identity with collective purpose. Anna Freud (1936) emphasized the ego’s synthetic function—its ability to coordinate and integrate information—which could adapt to prioritize collective goals.
Spiritual traditions, such as those articulated by Cynthia Bourgeault, suggest that unity consciousness fosters “nondual awareness,” where the ego integrates with a broader sense of self, perceiving no separation between self and others (Bourgeault, 2016). Neuroscience supports this, showing that mindfulness practices, which cultivate interconnectedness, reduce activity in the default mode network (DMN), the brain region tied to self-referential thinking (Brewer et al., 2011).
In an abundance mindset, the ego’s scarcity-driven behaviors, such as greed or entitlement, may dissolve. However, the “abundance paradox” suggests that extreme abundance can still fuel ego-driven behaviors if not balanced with self-awareness (Ser, 2023). Conscious cultivation of gratitude and collaboration can reorient the ego toward cooperative, creative expression.
Implications for Personality Models
Current personality models, such as Freud’s tripartite structure (id, ego, superego) or trait-based frameworks like the Big Five, assume a stable, individualistic ego operating in a competitive environment (McCrae & Costa, 2008). A shift to unity consciousness and abundance challenges these models in several ways:
- Redefining the Ego’s Role: In Freud’s model, the ego balances instinctual drives and societal norms. In a unity-conscious society, the ego may prioritize collective harmony, necessitating new models that account for interconnectedness. Cattell’s multivariate approach, which integrates physiological and social data, could evolve to include metrics for collective empathy or nondual awareness (Cattell, 1979).
- Shifting Trait Emphasis: Traits like conscientiousness or neuroticism, rooted in individual survival, may give way to traits like compassion or adaptability to collective goals. Research on interpersonal intelligence highlights the importance of understanding others’ emotions in cooperative societies (Gardner, 1983).
- Developmental Ego Psychology: Anna Freud’s work suggests the ego can adapt to new developmental stages (Mitchell & Black, 1995). A unity-conscious personality model might focus on ego-soul integration, balancing individual identity with collective purpose.
These shifts suggest personality models will need dynamic, multidimensional frameworks that account for both individual and collective dimensions of identity.
Societal Implications: A Vision of Unity and Abundance
A society rooted in unity consciousness and abundance would differ profoundly from our current scarcity-driven, hierarchical structures. Drawing from sociological and organizational theories, we can envision the following transformations:
- Cooperative Social Structures: Current societies often reward ego-driven competition, leading to inequality and conflict (Pollan, 2010). In an abundant society, cooperation becomes the norm, with shared resources and collective decision-making. Organizational theories of sustainability vision emphasize clarity, future orientation, and stakeholder satisfaction, guiding societal structures toward harmony (Kantabutra, 2020).
- Economic Redistribution: Abundance eliminates the need for hoarding or exploitation. Economic systems could shift toward universal basic income or resource-sharing models, reducing ego-driven status-seeking. Research on the abundance paradox suggests equitable distribution requires conscious self-awareness to avoid egoic entitlement (Ser, 2023).
- Cultural Shifts: Cultural narratives would emphasize interconnectedness over individualism. Storytelling, art, and education would foster empathy and creativity, with autoethnographic narratives replacing competitive success stories to encourage communal identity (Saskoer, 2019).
- Leadership and Governance: Leaders would embody “heart-awareness,” prioritizing compassion and nondual consciousness over egoic ambition (Bourgeault, 2016). Governance would involve participatory models, reflecting collective wisdom rather than top-down control.
These changes align with findings that gratitude and win-win thinking enhance well-being and cooperation (Castrillon, 2020). However, transitioning from scarcity to abundance requires dismantling entrenched power structures, which the ego often defends.
Envisioning a Flourishing Society: A Summation
The ego, once a guardian of survival in a world of scarcity, is poised for transformation in a society defined by unity consciousness and abundance. Rather than disappearing, it evolves into a bridge between individual and collective identity, fostering creativity, empathy, and shared purpose. This shift redefines personality models, moving from competition-driven traits to those that nurture interconnectedness, and reshapes societal structures toward cooperation and equity.
Imagine a world where communities thrive on shared resources, where education cultivates empathy as much as intellect, and where leadership inspires through compassion rather than control. In this society, art and storytelling celebrate our interconnectedness, weaving narratives that honor both the individual and the collective. Economic systems ensure no one is left behind, and governance reflects the wisdom of all voices. This is a world of human flourishing, where the ego’s role is not to separate but to connect, creating a harmonious balance that uplifts every individual and the whole.
This vision, grounded in psychological, sociological, and spiritual insights, offers hope for a future where the ego’s transformation unlocks humanity’s potential to live in harmony with one another and the planet. It invites us to reflect on our own ego-driven patterns and embrace the possibility of a more connected, abundant world.
Conclusion: The Ego’s Journey Forward
The ego, forged in scarcity, has been essential for survival, shaping our sense of self and social structures. In a world of unity consciousness and abundance, it transforms, integrating individual identity with collective purpose. This evolution challenges traditional personality models and redefines society toward cooperation, equity, and shared well-being.
This investigation, blending scholarly rigor with hopeful vision, invites us to imagine a world where the ego serves not as a barrier but as a bridge to human flourishing. By embracing this transformation, we can create a society that honors both the individual and the interconnected whole.
Crosslinks
- The Cosmic Dance of Souls: Relationships as Pathways to Unity — Uses intimacy and difference as a dojo for oneness without sameness.
- Codex of the Braid: Shared Overflow and Mutual Anchoring — Teaches how two (or many) fields interlock without fusion or co-dependence.
- Understanding Cosmic Laws: A Guide to Easing Suffering and Uniting Humanity — Grounds the journey in free will, non-coercion, and restorative balance.
- Resonance Metrics as a Spiritual Compass in Times of Uncertainty — Simple coherence checks (breath, tone, relief) for go/hold/repair in real time.
Glossary
- Abundance Mindset: A belief that resources, opportunities, and possibilities are plentiful, reducing the need for competition.
- Ego: The conscious, organizing part of the psyche that mediates between instincts, morality, and reality, often associated with self-identity.
- Scarcity Mindset: A belief that resources are limited, driving competition and self-preservation.
- Unity Consciousness: A state of awareness where individuals perceive themselves as interconnected with all beings, transcending egoic separation.
- Nondual Awareness: A state of consciousness where distinctions between self and others dissolve, fostering harmony and empathy.
- Default Mode Network (DMN): A brain network associated with self-referential thinking, often less active in states of interconnected awareness.
Bibliography
Bourgeault, C. (2016). The heart of centering prayer: Nondual Christianity in theory and practice. Shambhala Publications.
Brewer, J. A., Worhunsky, P. D., Gray, J. R., Tang, Y. Y., Weber, J., & Kober, H. (2011). Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 20254-20259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112029108
Buss, D. M. (2019). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (6th ed.). Routledge.
Castrillon, C. (2020, July 13). 5 ways to go from a scarcity to abundance mindset. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolinecastrillon/2020/07/13/5-ways-to-go-from-a-scarcity-to-abundance-mindset/
Cattell, R. B. (1979). Personality and learning theory: The structure of personality in its environment. Springer.
Freud, A. (1936). The ego and the mechanisms of defense. International Universities Press.
Freud, S. (1961). The ego and the id (J. Strachey, Trans.). W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1923)
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
Gusnard, D. A. (2017). Self-awareness and the brain. In Neuroscience of consciousness (pp. 123-145). Oxford University Press.
Hartmann, H. (1958). Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. International Universities Press.
Kantabutra, S. (2020). Toward an organizational theory of sustainability vision. Sustainability, 12(3), 1125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031125
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159-181). Guilford Press.
Mitchell, S. A., & Black, M. J. (1995). Freud and beyond: A history of modern psychoanalytic thought. Basic Books.
Pollan, M. (2010). The omnivore’s dilemma: A natural history of four meals. Penguin.
Rappaport, D. (1959). The structure of psychoanalytic theory. Psychological Issues, 2(2), 1-158.
Ser, S. (2023, July 10). The dark side of the ‘abundance mindset’. Seek With Ser. https://www.seekwithser.com/the-dark-side-of-the-abundance-mindset
Attribution
With fidelity to the Oversoul, may this work serve as bridge, remembrance, and seed for the planetary dawn.
Ⓒ 2025–2026 Gerald Alba Daquila
Flameholder of SHEYALOTH · Keeper of the Living Codices
All rights reserved.This material originates within the field of the Living Codex and is stewarded under Oversoul Appointment. It may be shared only in its complete and unaltered form, with all glyphs, seals, and attribution preserved.
This work is offered for personal reflection and sovereign discernment. It does not constitute a required belief system, formal doctrine, or institutional program.
Digital Edition Release: 2026
Lineage Marker: Universal Master Key (UMK) Codex FieldSacred Exchange & Access
Sacred Exchange is Overflow made visible.
In Oversoul stewardship, giving is circulation, not loss. Support for this work sustains the continued writing, preservation, and public availability of the Living Codices.
This material may be accessed through multiple pathways:
• Free online reading within the Living Archive
• Individual digital editions (e.g., Payhip releases)
• Subscription-based stewardship accessPaid editions support long-term custodianship, digital hosting, and future transmissions. Free access remains part of the archive’s mission.
Sacred Exchange offerings may be extended through:
paypal.me/GeraldDaquila694
www.geralddaquila.com -
Love That Lasts: Where Attachment, Growth, and Soul Converge
Unraveling the Role of Ego, Service to Others, and the Core Human Need for Connection
Prepared by: Gerald A. Daquila, PhD. Candidate
9–13 minutesABSTRACT
This dissertation explores why some romantic relationships endure while others unravel, integrating psychological, sociological, biological, and metaphysical perspectives, with a focus on ego and the Law of One’s service-to-others principle. It examines how ego-driven behaviors, such as defensiveness and self-interest, undermine connection, while service to others fosters trust, empathy, and mutual growth.
Key predictors of lasting love include effective communication, emotional intelligence, shared values, and ego-transcendence, countered by challenges like unmet expectations and poor conflict resolution. The Law of One frames love as a unifying force, aligning partners with universal harmony. Through concise analysis and practical strategies, this work offers a holistic model for scholars, practitioners, and individuals seeking to nurture enduring relationships, balancing empirical rigor with spiritual insight.
Table of Contents
- Introduction: The Quest for Lasting Love
- The Human Need for Connection: A Multidisciplinary Foundation
- The Ego’s Dual Role: Barrier and Bridge to Love
- Service to Others (Law of One): A Path to Relational Unity
- Why Relationships Endure: Core Success Factors
- Why Relationships Unravel: Key Challenges
- Secrets to Longevity: A Unified Synthesis
- Practical Strategies: Building Enduring Love
- Conclusion: A Holistic Vision of Love
- Glossary
- References
1. Introduction: The Quest for Lasting Love
Romantic relationships are a universal pursuit, yet their longevity remains elusive, with 40-50% of Western marriages ending in divorce (Amato, 2010). Why do some bonds flourish for decades, while others dissolve despite initial passion? This dissertation weaves psychological, sociological, biological, and metaphysical insights to uncover the secrets of enduring love, focusing on the interplay of ego and the Law of One’s service-to-others principle (Ra, 1984).
By blending empirical evidence with spiritual wisdom, it offers a cohesive, accessible narrative for scholars and lay readers alike, exploring how transcending ego and embracing selflessness can transform relationships into resilient, meaningful connections.
Glyph of the Bridgewalker
The One Who Holds Both Shores
2. The Human Need for Connection: A Multidisciplinary Foundation
Humans are wired for connection, driven by biological, psychological, and metaphysical imperatives that shape relational dynamics.
Biological Roots
Evolutionarily, pair-bonding ensured survival through reproduction and community stability (Buss, 2019). Oxytocin, released during intimacy, fosters trust and closeness (Carter, 2014), while dopamine fuels the euphoria of love, akin to addiction (Fisher, 2004). These mechanisms highlight the primal drive for connection, setting the stage for deeper emotional and spiritual bonds.
Psychological Needs
Attachment theory explains how early caregiver interactions shape adult relationships (Bowlby, 1982). Secure attachment fosters stability, while anxious or avoidant styles, often tied to ego, create challenges (Hazan & Shaver, 1987). Love and belonging, central to Maslow’s hierarchy, drive self-actualization (Maslow, 1943), making relationships a crucible for growth.
Metaphysical Purpose
Metaphysically, relationships are a path to spiritual unity. The Law of One views love as a force connecting all beings (Ra, 1984), echoing Plato’s idea of love as a ladder to the divine (Plato, 360 BCE/2008). Quantum physics suggests energetic entanglement mirrors relational bonds (Capra, 1999), framing love as both earthly and cosmic.
3. The Ego’s Dual Role: Barrier and Bridge to Love
Ego, the sense of self prioritizing individual desires, shapes relationships in contrasting ways, acting as both obstacle and enabler.
Ego as a Barrier
Ego-driven behaviors, like defensiveness or the need to be right, fuel conflict. Gottman’s (1994) “four horsemen”—criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling—reflect ego’s destructive impact, predicting relational failure. Attachment insecurities, rooted in egoic fears, exacerbate mistrust (Hazan & Shaver, 1987). Jung’s (1960) concept of the shadow suggests unacknowledged ego traits project onto partners, creating discord.
Ego as a Bridge
A balanced ego fosters self-awareness and accountability, supporting healthy connection. Emotional intelligence (EQ) tempers egoic impulses, enhancing empathy and conflict resolution (Goleman, 1995). By transcending pride through humility, partners transform ego into a tool for mutual growth, aligning with service-to-others principles (Ni, 2012; Ra, 1984).
4. Service to Others (Law of One): A Path to Relational Unity
The Law of One contrasts service to self (ego-driven) with service to others (love-driven), positing the latter as a path to unity (Ra, 1984). In relationships, service to others manifests as selflessness, empathy, and mutual support, fostering enduring love.
Fostering Connection
Acts of kindness, such as active listening or supporting a partner’s goals, build trust and intimacy (Gottman & Silver, 1999). Research links altruistic behaviors to higher relationship satisfaction (Lavner et al., 2020). Service to others aligns partners with love’s universal energy, creating a cycle of mutual reinforcement (Ra, 1984).
Transcending Ego
Service to others dissolves egoic barriers, such as control or validation-seeking, fostering unity. By prioritizing the partner’s well-being, couples mirror the interconnectedness of quantum entanglement (Capra, 1999). This approach strengthens resilience, as partners navigate challenges with a shared, selfless mindset.
Glyph of Love That Lasts
Where Attachment, Growth, and Soul Converge — weaving bonds that endure through evolution and unity
5. Why Relationships Endure: Core Success Factors
Enduring relationships blend ego-transcendence with practical strengths, supported by multidisciplinary insights.
Trust and Dependability
Trust, built through consistent, selfless actions, is the cornerstone of lasting love (Ni, 2012). Service to others reinforces trust by prioritizing mutual well-being (Rempel et al., 1985).
Effective Communication
Constructive communication—active listening, appreciation, and empathy—deepens connection (Gottman, 1994). Service to others reduces ego-driven defensiveness, fostering open dialogue (Gottman & Silver, 1999).
Emotional Intelligence
High EQ enables partners to manage emotions and empathize, countering egoic reactivity (Goleman, 1995). Service-oriented compassion enhances EQ, promoting harmony (Lavner et al., 2020).
Shared Values and Purpose
Shared values and goals create a unified vision (Lavner et al., 2020). The Law of One frames this alignment as a spiritual mission, transcending egoic differences (Ra, 1984).
Resilience
Resilient couples adapt to stressors through mutual support, reflecting a service-to-others mindset (Lavner, 2020). Flexibility ensures longevity amid life’s changes.
6. Why Relationships Unravel: Key Challenges
Ego-driven behaviors and external pressures often destabilize relationships, undermining service to others.
Ego-Driven Conflicts
Gottman’s four horsemen, rooted in ego, predict failure (Gottman, 1994). Service to self—prioritizing pride over unity—exacerbates these patterns (Ra, 1984).
Unmet Expectations
Unrealistic expectations, often ego-driven, lead to disappointment (Buss, 2019). Clear communication and selfless compromise can mitigate this risk.
Poor Conflict Resolution
Egoic defensiveness hinders conflict repair (Gottman & Silver, 1999). Service to others fosters humility, enabling reconciliation.
External Stressors
Financial strain or family pressures erode connection (Umberson et al., 2005). A service-oriented approach buffers stress through mutual support.
Attachment Insecurities
Egoic fears, like abandonment, fuel insecurity (Hazan & Shaver, 1987). Service to others builds trust, countering these challenges (Borelli et al., 2015).
7. Secrets to Longevity: A Unified Synthesis
Lasting relationships integrate ego-transcendence, service to others, and multidisciplinary principles.
Psychological Keys
- Build Trust: Consistent, selfless actions foster security (Ni, 2012).
- Communicate Effectively: Empathy and active listening reduce ego-driven conflict (Gottman & Silver, 1999).
- Cultivate EQ: Manage emotions to enhance connection (Goleman, 1995).
Sociological Factors
- Leverage Community: Social support bolsters resilience, aligning with service to others (Lavner, 2020).
- Bridge Cultural Gaps: Mutual respect aligns diverse values (Cho et al., 2020).
Biological Insights
- Nurture Intimacy: Physical touch strengthens bonds via oxytocin (Carter, 2014).
- Manage Stress: Mindfulness tempers egoic reactivity (Robles et al., 2014).
Metaphysical Wisdom
- Embrace Service to Others: Prioritize mutual well-being to align with universal love (Ra, 1984).
- Honor Synchronicity: Recognize meaningful coincidences as relational guides (Jung, 1960).
8. Practical Strategies: Building Enduring Love
These evidence-based, metaphysically informed strategies foster lasting relationships:
- Transcend Ego: Reflect on egoic behaviors and replace them with humility (Goleman, 1995).
- Practice Service to Others: Engage in selfless acts, like active listening or support (Ra, 1984).
- Communicate Intentionally: Use empathy and “I” statements (Gottman & Silver, 1999).
- Align on Purpose: Share values and goals for unity (Lavner et al., 2020).
- Incorporate Rituals: Meditation or gratitude practices deepen connection (Capra, 1999).
9. Conclusion: A Holistic Vision of Love
Enduring relationships blend trust, communication, EQ, and shared purpose, tempered by ego-transcendence and service to others. Ego-driven conflicts and external stressors challenge connection, but a selfless, unified approach fosters resilience. The Law of One frames love as a cosmic force, guiding partners toward mutual growth. This holistic model offers practical and spiritual insights for nurturing lasting love. Future research should explore service to others across diverse populations and longitudinal contexts.
Crosslinks
- The Cosmic Dance of Souls: Relationships as Pathways to Unity — Maps polarity and complementarity so difference becomes fuel, not friction.
- Codex of the Braid: Shared Overflow and Mutual Anchoring — Prevents co-dependence by teaching shared overflow, clear roles, and repair rituals.
- Divine Timing: A Guide for Souls on the Verge of Awakening — Protects the bond from forcing; honors seasons of intimacy, distance, and return.
- Resonance Metrics as a Spiritual Compass in Times of Uncertainty — Simple coherence check-ins (breath, tone, relief) to decide: love now, pause, or repair.
- Understanding Cosmic Laws: A Guide to Easing Suffering and Uniting Humanity — Grounds agreements in consent, truth, and restorative balance.
10. Glossary
- Attachment Theory: Framework for how early relationships shape adult bonds (Bowlby, 1982).
- Ego: Sense of self prioritizing individual desires, often obstructing connection (Jung, 1960).
- Emotional Intelligence (EQ): Ability to manage and understand emotions (Goleman, 1995).
- Law of One: Metaphysical philosophy emphasizing service to others and unity (Ra, 1984).
- Oxytocin: Hormone fostering trust and bonding (Carter, 2014).
- Service to Others: Prioritizing others’ well-being for unity (Ra, 1984).
- Synchronicity: Meaningful coincidences suggesting deeper purpose (Jung, 1960).
11. References
Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x
Borelli, J. L., Rasmussen, H. F., Burkhart, M. L., & Sbarra, D. A. (2015). Relational savoring in long-distance romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(3), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514539698
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). Basic Books.
Buss, D. M. (2019). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (6th ed.). Routledge.
Capra, F. (1999). The Tao of physics: An exploration of the parallels between modern physics and Eastern mysticism (4th ed.). Shambhala.
Carter, C. S. (2014). Oxytocin pathways and the evolution of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115110
Cho, H., Kim, J., & Park, J. (2020). Cultural influences on marital satisfaction: A comparative study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(6), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022120927399
Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Joel, S. (2023). Mate evaluation theory: A psychological framework for understanding partner selection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(4), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02567-8
Fisher, H. E. (2004). Why we love: The nature and chemistry of romantic love. Henry Holt.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work. Harmony Books.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
Jung, C. G. (1960). Synchronicity: An acausal connecting principle. Princeton University Press.
Lavner, J. A., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2020). Relationship quality and stability: A longitudinal study of newlyweds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(4), 1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12671
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
Ni, P. (2012). 7 keys to long-term relationship success. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/communication-success/201210/7-keys-long-term-relationship-success
Plato. (2008). Symposium (R. Waterfield, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 360 BCE)
Ra. (1984). The Law of One: Book I (D. Elkins, J. A. McCarty, & C. Rueckert, Eds.). L/L Research.
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95
Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859
Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D. A., Chen, M. D., & Campbell, A. M. (2005). As good as it gets? A life course perspective on marital quality. Social Forces, 84(1), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0131
Attribution
With fidelity to the Oversoul, may this work serve as bridge, remembrance, and seed for the planetary dawn.
Ⓒ 2025–2026 Gerald Alba Daquila
Flameholder of SHEYALOTH · Keeper of the Living Codices
All rights reserved.This material originates within the field of the Living Codex and is stewarded under Oversoul Appointment. It may be shared only in its complete and unaltered form, with all glyphs, seals, and attribution preserved.
This work is offered for personal reflection and sovereign discernment. It does not constitute a required belief system, formal doctrine, or institutional program.
Digital Edition Release: 2026
Lineage Marker: Universal Master Key (UMK) Codex FieldSacred Exchange & Access
Sacred Exchange is Overflow made visible.
In Oversoul stewardship, giving is circulation, not loss. Support for this work sustains the continued writing, preservation, and public availability of the Living Codices.
This material may be accessed through multiple pathways:
• Free online reading within the Living Archive
• Individual digital editions (e.g., Payhip releases)
• Subscription-based stewardship accessPaid editions support long-term custodianship, digital hosting, and future transmissions. Free access remains part of the archive’s mission.
Sacred Exchange offerings may be extended through:
paypal.me/GeraldDaquila694
www.geralddaquila.com -
Pieces of the Self: Soul Fragmentation Across Psyche, Society, and Spirit
A Holistic Investigation into the Morphology, Psychological Implications, and Spiritual Significance of Soul Fragmentation
Prepared by: Gerald A. Daquila, PhD. Candidate
9–14 minutesABSTRACT
Soul fragmentation is a concept rooted in both metaphysical traditions and psychological frameworks, often described as the splitting or dissociation of a person’s soul or consciousness due to trauma, stress, or existential disconnection. This dissertation explores the phenomenon of soul fragmentation, its potential relationship to the “veil of forgetting,” its role as a coping mechanism, and its parallels with dissociative identity disorder (DID).
Using a multidisciplinary lens that integrates psychology, neuroscience, anthropology, and metaphysics, this study examines the morphology and reasons for soul fragmentation, emphasizing the necessity of soul integration for healing. By synthesizing scholarly research with metaphysical perspectives, this work offers a holistic understanding of how soul fragmentation manifests, its impact on mental and spiritual well-being, and pathways to reintegration. The narrative balances academic rigor with accessible language, aiming to engage a broad audience while maintaining coherence and logical flow.
Introduction
The concept of soul fragmentation has captivated spiritual seekers, psychologists, and philosophers alike, offering a lens to understand the human experience of disconnection, trauma, and identity. In metaphysical traditions, soul fragmentation is often described as the splitting of one’s soul or energetic essence, resulting in a loss of wholeness. In psychology, similar phenomena are observed in dissociative identity disorder (DID), where the self fragments into distinct personalities as a response to trauma.
But what causes soul fragmentation? Is it a by-product of the “veil of forgetting”—a metaphysical concept suggesting we forget our divine origins upon incarnating into physical form? Or is it a coping mechanism to endure life’s challenges? And how does it relate to psychological disorders like DID? This dissertation delves into these questions, weaving together insights from psychology, neuroscience, anthropology, and metaphysics to explore the morphology and purpose of soul fragmentation, and whether soul integration is essential for healing.
Glyph of the Bridgewalker
The One Who Holds Both Shores
Chapter 1: Defining Soul Fragmentation
What Is Soul Fragmentation?
Soul fragmentation refers to the perceived or experiential splitting of a person’s consciousness, energy, or soul into separate parts, often triggered by trauma, emotional distress, or significant life events. In metaphysical contexts, it is believed that fragments of the soul may detach and become “lost” in other dimensions, timelines, or energetic realms, leading to feelings of emptiness, disconnection, or loss of purpose (Ascension Glossary, 2024). Psychologically, fragmentation is akin to dissociation, where parts of the self operate independently, sometimes manifesting as alternate identities or altered states of consciousness.
The Veil of Forgetting
The “veil of forgetting” is a metaphysical concept suggesting that upon incarnation, humans forget their spiritual origins and divine purpose to navigate life’s lessons in the physical world. Some metaphysical traditions propose that soul fragmentation may occur as a by-product of this veil, as the soul struggles to reconcile its infinite nature with the limitations of physical existence. This disconnection can lead to existential crises, amplifying the fragmentation process.
Soul Fragmentation as a Coping Mechanism
Trauma, whether physical, emotional, or psychological, is a primary trigger for soul fragmentation. When faced with overwhelming experiences—such as abuse, loss, or betrayal—the psyche may dissociate to protect itself, splitting off parts of the self to contain the pain. This aligns with psychological theories of dissociation, where the mind creates barriers to shield itself from unbearable memories or emotions (Hacking, 1998). In this sense, soul fragmentation serves as a survival strategy, allowing individuals to endure life’s ordeals by compartmentalizing their experiences.
Chapter 2: Soul Fragmentation and Dissociative Identity Disorder
Parallels with Dissociative Identity Disorder
Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), formerly known as multiple personality disorder, is a psychiatric condition characterized by the presence of two or more distinct identities or “alters” within an individual, often resulting from severe childhood trauma (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The parallels between soul fragmentation and DID are striking. Both involve a splitting of the self, where parts of the individual’s consciousness operate independently, often unaware of each other. In DID, these alters may take control of behavior, while in soul fragmentation, metaphysical traditions suggest that soul fragments may exist outside the individual’s conscious awareness, trapped in other realms or timelines (Ascension Glossary, 2024).
Research by Ian Hacking (1998) in Rewriting the Soul highlights how DID emerged as a clinical phenomenon in the late 20th century, linked to societal shifts in understanding trauma and memory. Hacking argues that DID reflects cultural and scientific efforts to secularize the soul by framing memory as a surrogate for spiritual essence. This perspective bridges the psychological and metaphysical, suggesting that DID may be a clinical manifestation of soul fragmentation, where trauma disrupts the unity of consciousness.
Critiques of the Fragmentation Model
Not all scholars agree that DID results from a literal fragmentation of the mind. A psychoanalytic study by Reis (1993) challenges the idea that DID involves a “falling apart” of the mind, proposing instead that it stems from powerful organizing fantasies of being controlled by external entities. This view suggests that DID is less about fragmentation and more about the psyche’s attempt to maintain coherence through imagined multiplicity. However, metaphysical perspectives counter that these fantasies may reflect spiritual truths, where soul fragments are indeed “lost” or controlled by external energies.
Chapter 3: The Morphology of Soul Fragmentation
Psychological Mechanisms
From a psychological perspective, soul fragmentation manifests as dissociation, a process where the mind separates thoughts, memories, or emotions to cope with trauma. Neuroscientific research supports this, showing that trauma alters brain function, particularly in the prefrontal cortex and amygdala, which regulate memory and emotional regulation (van der Kolk, 2014). These changes can create a fragmented sense of self, as the brain struggles to integrate traumatic experiences into a cohesive narrative.
Anthropological and Cultural Perspectives
Anthropologically, soul fragmentation is a recurring theme in indigenous and shamanic traditions. For example, Andean shamans (paqos) describe soul loss as a response to trauma, where parts of the soul become “stuck” in a timeless dimension (Lessons of the Inca Shamans, 2014). Soul retrieval ceremonies aim to locate and reintegrate these fragments, restoring wholeness. Similarly, in African and Native American traditions, rituals for soul recovery emphasize the importance of community and spiritual practices in healing fragmentation.
Metaphysical Morphology
Metaphysically, soul fragmentation is often described as an energetic phenomenon, where parts of the soul’s energy field detach due to trauma or karmic imbalances. The Ascension Glossary (2024) suggests that these fragments may attach to other timelines or negative entities, leading to psychological symptoms like depression, anxiety, or dissociation. This view aligns with the concept of the “luminous body” in shamanic traditions, where the soul’s energy field is seen as a dynamic, interconnected system that can fracture under stress.
Glyph of Soul Fragmentation
Pieces of the Self — exploring fragmentation across psyche, society, and spirit, and the path back to wholeness
Chapter 4: The Necessity of Soul Integration for Healing
Psychological Approaches to Integration
In psychology, integration is a cornerstone of healing for dissociative disorders. Therapies like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), and internal family systems (IFS) aim to help individuals process traumatic memories and reintegrate fragmented parts of the self (van der Kolk, 2014). These approaches emphasize creating a safe therapeutic environment where alters or dissociated parts can communicate and merge into a unified sense of self.
Shamanic and Spiritual Practices
In metaphysical traditions, soul integration is achieved through rituals like soul retrieval, where shamans journey to retrieve lost soul fragments and reintegrate them into the individual’s energy field (Lessons of the Inca Shamans, 2014). These practices often involve creating a “safe temenos” (sacred space) to facilitate healing, mirroring the therapeutic alliance in psychoanalysis. Logotherapy, based on Viktor Frankl’s philosophy, also emphasizes finding meaning in suffering as a pathway to integration, aligning psychological and spiritual healing (Pereira et al., 2023).
The Role of Meaning-Making
Both psychological and metaphysical approaches highlight the importance of meaning-making in healing soul fragmentation. Frankl’s logotherapy suggests that finding purpose in suffering can transform fragmented states into personal growth (Pereira et al., 2023). Similarly, shamanic practices view soul retrieval as a process of reclaiming one’s life narrative, allowing individuals to weave fragmented experiences into a coherent story.
Chapter 5: A Multidisciplinary and Metaphysical Synthesis
Bridging the Divide
A multidisciplinary lens reveals that soul fragmentation is both a psychological and spiritual phenomenon. Psychologically, it manifests as dissociation, driven by trauma and neurological changes. Anthropologically, it appears in cultural rituals that address soul loss. Metaphysically, it is understood as an energetic splitting, influenced by the veil of forgetting and karmic dynamics. By integrating these perspectives, we gain a holistic understanding of soul fragmentation as a response to existential and traumatic challenges, with integration as a pathway to wholeness.
The Purpose of Soul Fragmentation
Why does soul fragmentation occur? Psychologically, it serves as a coping mechanism to protect the self from overwhelming pain. Metaphysically, it may be a byproduct of the veil of forgetting, as the soul navigates the tension between its divine essence and physical limitations. Some traditions suggest that fragmentation allows the soul to explore multiple aspects of existence, gaining wisdom through diverse experiences. However, prolonged fragmentation can lead to psychological distress and spiritual disconnection, necessitating integration for healing.
Chapter 6: Conclusion
Soul fragmentation is a multifaceted phenomenon that bridges psychology, anthropology, and metaphysics. Whether viewed as a coping mechanism for trauma, a byproduct of the veil of forgetting, or a spiritual journey of exploration, it reflects the human struggle to maintain wholeness in a fragmented world. Its parallels with dissociative identity disorder highlight the interplay between psychological and spiritual dimensions, while the necessity of soul integration underscores the universal quest for healing and meaning. By embracing a multidisciplinary and metaphysical lens, we can better understand the morphology and purpose of soul fragmentation, offering pathways to wholeness for individuals and communities alike.
Crosslinks
- Mapping the Soul’s Journey: A 360-Degree View of Life, Death, and the Afterlife — Uses life-review logic to transmute fracture into vows, amends, and embodied wholeness.
- Codex of the Braid: Shared Overflow and Mutual Anchoring — Shows how inner parts and social factions braid instead of battle, converting conflict into forward current.
- Resonance Metrics as a Spiritual Compass in Times of Uncertainty — Tracks integration somatically (breath, coherence, relief) and sets gentle titration cadence.
- Understanding Cosmic Laws: A Guide to Easing Suffering and Uniting Humanity — Grounds healing in free will, consent, and restorative balance—no coercion, no spiritual bypass.
Glossary
- Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID): A psychiatric condition characterized by the presence of two or more distinct identities or personality states, often linked to childhood trauma.
- Soul Fragmentation: The perceived splitting of a person’s soul or consciousness, often due to trauma, resulting in feelings of disconnection or loss of wholeness.
- Veil of Forgetting: A metaphysical concept suggesting that humans forget their spiritual origins upon incarnating into physical form.
- Soul Retrieval: A shamanic practice aimed at locating and reintegrating lost soul fragments to restore wholeness.
- Logotherapy: A therapeutic approach developed by Viktor Frankl, emphasizing finding meaning in life as a pathway to healing.
- Luminous Body: A metaphysical term for the energetic field surrounding a person, believed to contain their soul’s essence.
Bibliography
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Ascension Glossary. (2024). Soul fragmentation. Retrieved from https://ascensionglossary.com%5B%5D(https://ascensionglossary.com/index.php/Soul_Fragmentation)
Hacking, I. (1998). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton University Press.
Lessons of the Inca Shamans. (2014). Soul retrieval and psychoanalysis. Retrieved from https://lessonsoftheincashamans.com%5B%5D(https://lessonsoftheincashamans.com/2014/04/06/soul-retrieval-and-psychoanalysis/)
Pereira, E. R., Silva, R. M. C. R. A., & Vale de Medeiros, A. Y. B. B. (2023). The medical healing of souls: A strategy for welcoming post-pandemic mental health. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 76(6), e20220331. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0331[](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10695047/)
Reis, B. E. (1993). Toward a psychoanalytic understanding of multiple personality disorder. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 57(3), 309-318.
van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.
Attribution
With fidelity to the Oversoul, may this work serve as bridge, remembrance, and seed for the planetary dawn.
Ⓒ 2025–2026 Gerald Alba Daquila
Flameholder of SHEYALOTH · Keeper of the Living Codices
All rights reserved.This material originates within the field of the Living Codex and is stewarded under Oversoul Appointment. It may be shared only in its complete and unaltered form, with all glyphs, seals, and attribution preserved.
This work is offered for personal reflection and sovereign discernment. It does not constitute a required belief system, formal doctrine, or institutional program.
Digital Edition Release: 2026
Lineage Marker: Universal Master Key (UMK) Codex FieldSacred Exchange & Access
Sacred Exchange is Overflow made visible.
In Oversoul stewardship, giving is circulation, not loss. Support for this work sustains the continued writing, preservation, and public availability of the Living Codices.
This material may be accessed through multiple pathways:
• Free online reading within the Living Archive
• Individual digital editions (e.g., Payhip releases)
• Subscription-based stewardship accessPaid editions support long-term custodianship, digital hosting, and future transmissions. Free access remains part of the archive’s mission.
Sacred Exchange offerings may be extended through:
paypal.me/GeraldDaquila694
www.geralddaquila.com
Life.Understood. 