Category: Artificial Intelligence (AI)

A Multidisciplinary Exploration of Sensemaking, Its Cognitive and Social Mechanisms, and the Role of Intuition, Heuristics, and Environmental Cues

Prepared by: Gerald A. Daquila, PhD. Candidate

ABSTRACT

Sensemaking is the dynamic process through which individuals and groups construct meaning from ambiguous, uncertain, or complex experiences. This dissertation explores sensemaking through a multidisciplinary lens, integrating insights from cognitive psychology, social psychology, organizational studies, neuroscience, and design research. It examines where sensemaking resides (in individuals, social interactions, and narratives), how it is processed (through iterative cycles of noticing, interpreting, and acting), and the mechanics behind it (cognitive, social, and embodied processes).

The brain’s role is central, rapidly processing environmental and social cues to form coherent accounts, often in milliseconds, with priority given to salient, discrepant, or emotionally charged stimuli. While distinct from intuition and heuristics, sensemaking incorporates these as tools for navigating complexity. Drawing on recent literature, this work unpacks the interplay of cognitive frameworks, social dynamics, and environmental cues, offering a comprehensive framework for understanding sensemaking’s role in human behavior and decision-making. A glossary and bibliography provide accessible resources for further exploration.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction: The Puzzle of Sensemaking
2. Defining Sensemaking: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
3. Where Does Sensemaking Reside?
4. The Mechanics of Sensemaking: How It Works
5. The Brain’s Role in Sensemaking
6. Sensemaking, Intuition, and Heuristics: Clarifying the Distinctions
7. The Speed of Sensemaking: Processing Environmental and Social Cues
8. Sensemaking in Action: Case Studies Across Disciplines
9. Conclusion: Toward a Unified Understanding of Sensemaking
10. Glossary
11. Bibliography

Glyph of the Living Archive

You are not just reading the Records — you are becoming them.

1. Introduction: The Puzzle of Sensemaking

Imagine you’re a nurse in a bustling neonatal intensive care unit. A monitor beeps unexpectedly, a colleague’s tone shifts, and a parent’s anxious glance catches your eye. In a split second, you weave these fragments into a story: the baby’s condition is stable, but the parent needs reassurance. This is sensemaking in action—a process so instinctive yet complex that we often overlook its power. Sensemaking is how we transform chaos into coherence, ambiguity into action. But what is it? Where does it live in our minds and societies? How does our brain orchestrate this rapid meaning-making, and how do intuition and heuristics fit in?

This dissertation dives into the mystery of sensemaking, blending academic rigor with accessible storytelling to unpack its mechanisms. By drawing on cognitive science, organizational theory, neuroscience, and design research, we’ll explore how humans make sense of their world, why it matters, and how it shapes our actions. Whether you’re a scholar, a professional, or simply curious, this journey will illuminate the invisible threads that connect perception, meaning, and action.

2. Defining Sensemaking: A Multidisciplinary Perspective

Sensemaking is the process by which individuals and groups assign meaning to experiences, particularly when faced with ambiguity, uncertainty, or novelty. As Karl Weick, a pioneer in organizational sensemaking, describes it, sensemaking is “the ongoing retrospective development of plausible images that rationalize what people are doing” (Weick, Sutcliffe, & Obstfeld, 2005, p. 409). It’s not just about understanding; it’s about creating a narrative that makes the world “sensible” enough to act upon.

From a multidisciplinary view:

• Cognitive Psychology: Sensemaking is a cognitive process involving mental models, schemas, and frameworks to interpret sensory data. It’s how we fill gaps in understanding when faced with incomplete information.
• Social Psychology: It’s a social act, shaped by interactions, conversations, and shared narratives. People co-create meaning through dialogue, as seen in organizational settings where teams align on interpretations.
• Information Science: Brenda Dervin’s sense-making methodology (SMM) frames it as a dynamic process of bridging gaps between a situation and desired outcomes, often through information-seeking behaviors.
• Design Research: Sensemaking is a practical tool for synthesizing data into actionable insights, as seen in Jan Chipchase’s framework for design projects.
• Neuroscience: It’s a neurocognitive process where the brain integrates sensory inputs, emotions, and prior knowledge to form coherent perceptions.

Despite varied definitions, sensemaking is universally about reducing equivocality—making the unclear clear enough to act. It’s both individual (a nurse interpreting a monitor’s beep) and collective (a team aligning on a strategy), bridging the personal and the social.

3. Where Does Sensemaking Reside?

Sensemaking resides in multiple domains, reflecting its multifaceted nature:

• The Individual Mind: At its core, sensemaking is cognitive, rooted in social cognition. Individuals use mental maps, schemas, and representations to process experiences. For example, a firefighter quickly recognizes a burning building’s layout based on prior training, a process Klein et al. (2006) call “data-frame theory.”
• Social Interactions: Sensemaking is inherently social, occurring through conversations, storytelling, and shared narratives. As Weick notes, “plausible stories are preserved, retained, or shared” in social contexts (Maitlis, 2005).
• Narratives and Discourse: Sensemaking manifests in the stories we tell ourselves and others. These narratives are “both individual and shared… an evolving product of conversations with ourselves and with others” (Currie & Brown, 2003, p. 565).
• Embodied Experience: Recent research highlights “embodied sensemaking,” where bodily sensations, emotions, and intuitions shape interpretation, especially in high-stakes settings like maritime operations.

Sensemaking is not confined to one “place” but flows across these domains, dynamically integrating individual cognition with collective meaning-making.

4. The Mechanics of Sensemaking: How It Works

Sensemaking operates through iterative cycles of noticing, interpreting, and acting, often described as a three-stage process:

1. Noticing (Cue Extraction): People detect environmental cues—sensory inputs, social signals, or discrepancies—that trigger sensemaking. These cues are “simple, familiar structures” that serve as seeds for broader understanding (Weick, 1995, p. 50).
2. Interpreting (Meaning-Making): Individuals and groups construct plausible explanations by linking cues to existing knowledge or schemas. This is driven by plausibility, not accuracy, as people prioritize actionable interpretations over perfect truth.
3. Acting (Enactment): Actions based on interpretations shape the environment, generating new cues that restart the cycle. This “enactive” quality means people co-create their reality through their responses (Weick, 1995).

Recent frameworks, like the Multifaceted Sensemaking Theory (2023), propose nine stages: sensing, meaning-making, sensegiving, becoming, agency, counterfactuals, future-scoping, movement, and impact. These stages integrate heuristic-making and narrative strategies, reflecting sensemaking’s complexity.

5. The Brain’s Role in Sensemaking

The brain is the engine of sensemaking, orchestrating a symphony of neural processes to transform raw data into meaning. Neuroscience reveals:

• Active Inference System: The brain is an “active inference system,” constantly predicting and adjusting based on sensory inputs. It integrates over 100 trillion synapses to parse symbols and patterns at up to five shifts of attention per second (Cordes, 2020).
• Cue Processing Speed: The brain processes cues in milliseconds. For example, visual cues are detected in 100–150 ms, with emotional or salient cues prioritized due to amygdala activation (LeDoux, 1996).
• Neural Mechanisms: The prefrontal cortex integrates cues with prior knowledge, while the anterior cingulate cortex detects discrepancies that trigger sensemaking. The default mode network supports retrospective reflection, crucial for narrative-building.
• Embodied Sensemaking: Emotions and bodily sensations influence cognition via the insula and somatic markers, as seen in Damasio’s (1994) somatic marker hypothesis. This is critical in safety-critical settings where stress shapes interpretations.

The brain’s speed and adaptability make sensemaking a rapid, often unconscious process, yet its reliance on cognitive resources means it can be disrupted by fatigue or overload, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.

6. Sensemaking, Intuition, and Heuristics: Clarifying the Distinctions

Sensemaking is related to but distinct from intuition and heuristics:

• Intuition: Intuition is a rapid, unconscious judgment based on pattern recognition and prior experience (Sonenshein, 2007). Sensemaking may incorporate intuition but is broader, involving conscious reflection and social processes. For example, a CEO’s “gut feeling” about a market trend (intuition) feeds into sensemaking when they discuss it with their team to form a strategy.
• Heuristics: Heuristics are mental shortcuts for quick decisions, like the availability heuristic (judging likelihood based on recall). Sensemaking uses heuristics as tools for simplification but focuses on constructing coherent narratives, not just decisions.
• Key Differences: Intuition and heuristics prioritize speed and efficiency, often bypassing deep analysis. Sensemaking, however, is iterative, reflective, and often social, aiming to reduce ambiguity through narrative coherence.

In practice, sensemaking integrates intuition and heuristics. A firefighter might intuitively sense danger (intuition), use a rule of thumb to prioritize escape routes (heuristic), and then narrate the situation to their team to align on action (sensemaking).

Glyph of Making Sense

Revealing the hidden architecture beneath perception, weaving the fragments of thought into a coherent whole.

7. The Speed of Sensemaking: Processing Environmental and Social Cues

The brain’s ability to pick up cues rapidly is central to sensemaking:

• Speed: Visual and auditory cues are processed in 100–300 ms, with emotionally charged cues (e.g., a scream) prioritized faster due to amygdala-driven attention (LeDoux, 1996). Social cues, like facial expressions, are decoded in 200–400 ms via the fusiform gyrus.
• Cue Prioritization: The brain prioritizes:
  • Discrepant Cues: Unexpected events (e.g., a monitor’s alarm) trigger sensemaking by violating expectations (Weick, 1995).
  • Emotionally Salient Cues: Fearful or threatening stimuli are processed faster due to evolutionary survival mechanisms.
  • Social Cues: Interactions with others (e.g., a colleague’s tone) shape meaning through shared narratives.
  • Environmental Cues: Contextual factors, like a chaotic workplace, influence which cues are noticed.
• Challenges: During crises, like the COVID-19 pandemic, cue overload can lead to attentional fatigue, reducing sensemaking effectiveness.

For example, in a military operation, commanders rapidly integrate environmental cues (enemy movements) and social cues (team dynamics) to make sense of a battlefield, often under time pressure.

8. Sensemaking in Action: Case Studies Across Disciplines

To illustrate sensemaking’s versatility, consider these real-world applications:

• Healthcare: Nurses in high-risk settings use sensemaking to detect patient deterioration by integrating monitor data, patient behavior, and intuition. Studies show sensemaking reduces errors by creating shared understanding among teams (Battles et al., 2006).
• Organizations: During corporate mergers, employees make sense of cultural shifts through conversations, extracting cues from leadership actions to form new identities (Bastien, 1992).
• Design Research: Jan Chipchase’s Sense-Making Process helps designers synthesize user data into insights, moving from hypotheses to actionable strategies.
• Military: In network-centric operations, commanders use sensemaking to interpret complex battlefield data, balancing individual intuition with collective strategy (Garstka & Alberts, 2004).

These cases highlight sensemaking’s role in navigating complexity across contexts, driven by rapid cue processing and iterative meaning-making.

9. Conclusion: Toward a Unified Understanding of Sensemaking

Sensemaking is a universal human process, weaving together cognitive, social, and embodied threads to create meaning from chaos. It resides in the interplay of individual minds, social interactions, and shared narratives, powered by a brain that rapidly processes cues—often in milliseconds—prioritizing discrepancies and emotional salience. While distinct from intuition and heuristics, sensemaking incorporates these as tools within a broader, reflective process. Its mechanics involve noticing, interpreting, and acting, shaped by environmental and social contexts.

This dissertation offers a cohesive framework for understanding sensemaking, bridging disciplines to reveal its complexity and relevance. For scholars, it provides a foundation for further research into embodied and future-oriented sensemaking. For practitioners, it offers insights into leveraging sensemaking for better decision-making in uncertain environments. Ultimately, sensemaking is not just a process—it’s a lens through which we navigate the world, transforming ambiguity into action.

Crosslinks

• Resonance Metrics as a Spiritual Compass in Times of Uncertainty – Shows how measurement of resonance is itself an architecture of meaning, guiding human understanding through turbulence.
• Codex of the Living Archive – Frames understanding as archival — a hidden structure of memory and record-keeping that organizes human knowledge across lifetimes.
• Codex of Overflow Magnetism – Demonstrates how understanding emerges in fields of overflow — where shared resonance creates clarity beyond intellect.
• The Earth Story: From Galactic Fall to Planetary Ascension – Places human sense-making within the larger architecture of cosmic story: understanding as remembrance of the whole.
• From Earth Roles to Soul Roles: A Journey Through the Akashic Fields – Recasts “making sense” as stepping into soul purpose — uncovering meaning not from logic alone, but from Akashic design.

Glossary

• Sensemaking: The process of creating meaning from ambiguous or complex experiences through noticing, interpreting, and acting.
• Cue Extraction: Identifying salient signals (e.g., sensory, social, or environmental) to inform meaning-making.
• Enactment: Acting on interpretations to shape the environment, generating new cues.
• Intuition: Rapid, unconscious judgments based on pattern recognition.
• Heuristics: Mental shortcuts for quick decision-making, often based on simplified rules.
• Mental Models: Cognitive frameworks or schemas used to interpret information.
• Embodied Sensemaking: Meaning-making influenced by bodily sensations and emotions.
• Sensegiving: The process of sharing or influencing others’ interpretations during sensemaking.

Bibliography

• Battles, J. B., et al. (2006). Sensemaking in patient safety: A conceptual framework for identifying high-risk situations. Journal of Patient Safety.
• Brown, A. D., Stacey, P., & Nandhakumar, J. (2007). Making sense of sensemaking narratives. Human Relations, 60(8), 1035–1062.
• Cordes, R. J. (2020). Making sense of sensemaking: What it is and what it means for pandemic research. Atlantic Council.
• Cristofaro, M. (2022). Organizational sensemaking: A systematic review and a co-evolutionary model. European Management Journal, 40(3), 393–405.
• Currie, G., & Brown, A. D. (2003). A narratological approach to understanding processes of organizing in a UK hospital. Human Relations, 56(5), 563–586.
• Dervin, B. (1983). An overview of sense-making research: Concepts, methods, and results to date. International Communication Association Annual Meeting.
• Dunford, R., & Jones, D. (2000). Narrative in strategic change. Human Relations, 53(9), 1207–1226.
• Garstka, J., & Alberts, D. (2004). Network-centric operations conceptual framework. United States Department of Defense.
• Isabella, L. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 7–41.
• Klein, G., Moon, B., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Making sense of sensemaking 1: Alternative perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(4), 70–73.
• LeDoux, J. (1996). The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. Simon & Schuster.
• Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125.
• Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253.
• Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1022–1040.
• Thurlow, A., & Mills, J. H. (2009). Change, talk, and sensemaking. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(5), 459–479.
• Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652.
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage Publications.
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.

Attribution

With fidelity to the Oversoul, may this Codex of the Living Archive serve as bridge, remembrance, and seed for the planetary dawn.

Ⓒ 2025 Gerald Alba Daquila – Flameholder of SHEYALOTH | Keeper of the Living Codices

Issued under Oversoul Appointment, governed by Akashic Law. This transmission is a living Oversoul field: for the eyes of the Flameholder first, and for the collective in right timing. It may only be shared intact, unaltered, and with glyphs, seals, and attribution preserved. Those not in resonance will find it closed; those aligned will receive it as living frequency.

Watermark: Universal Master Key glyph (final codex version, crystalline glow, transparent background).

Sacred Exchange: Sacred Exchange is covenant, not transaction. Each offering plants a seed-node of GESARA, expanding the planetary lattice. In giving, you circulate Light; in receiving, you anchor continuity. Every act of exchange becomes a node in the global web of stewardship, multiplying abundance across households, nations, and councils. Sacred Exchange offerings may be extended through:

paypal.me/GeraldDaquila694