A Multidisciplinary Journey Through Philosophy, Neuroscience, Spirituality, and Social Dynamics
Prepared by: Gerald A. Daquila, PhD. Candidate
ABSTRACT
Free will is a cornerstone of human experience, shaping our choices, responsibilities, and interactions. This dissertation explores the definition, mechanics, purpose, and origins of free will, drawing from philosophical, neuroscientific, metaphysical, esoteric, and spiritual perspectives. It examines how individuals navigate life amidst uncertainties about free will, how we influence others as parents, leaders, or officials without infringing on their autonomy, and how free will contributes to a harmonious society.
The study also investigates whether global trends toward spiritual and intellectual awakening reflect a growing understanding of free will’s truth. Using a multidisciplinary lens, this work synthesizes classical and contemporary scholarship, esoteric traditions, and empirical research to offer a cohesive narrative. It proposes that free will is a dynamic interplay of agency, consciousness, and interconnectedness, guiding humanity toward ethical coexistence and collective evolution.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Defining Free Will: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
- The Mechanics of Free Will: How Does It Work?
- The Purpose and Origin of Free Will
- Navigating Life Without Full Knowledge of Free Will
- Influencing Others as Sovereign Souls
- Building a Harmonious Society: Balancing Free Will and Collective Good
- Global Awakening: Are We Recognizing the Truth of Free Will?
- Conclusion
- Glossary
- Bibliography

Glyph of Sovereignty
Freedom is not given, it is remembered.
1. Introduction
Free will captivates philosophers, scientists, spiritual seekers, and everyday individuals alike. It’s the invisible force behind our choices, the spark of agency that defines us as humans. But what is free will? How does it function? Why does it exist, and who or what brought it into being? How do we live meaningfully without fully understanding it? And in a world of sovereign souls, how do we influence others—whether as parents, leaders, or policymakers—without overstepping their autonomy? These questions are not just academic; they touch the heart of human existence, shaping how we build relationships and societies.
This dissertation dives deep into these inquiries, weaving together insights from philosophy, neuroscience, metaphysics, esoteric traditions, and spiritual texts. It explores how free will operates, its purpose, and its role in fostering a harmonious society. It also examines whether humanity’s growing “awakening”—a global trend toward spiritual and intellectual awareness—signals a deeper grasp of free will’s essence. Written for a broad audience, this work balances accessibility with scholarly rigor, inviting readers to reflect on their own agency and its implications for a connected world.
2. Defining Free Will: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Free will is often described as the ability to make choices free from internal and external constraints, enabling individuals to act according to their desires or reasons (Feldman, 2017). Philosophically, it’s tied to concepts of agency, moral responsibility, and self-determination. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines free will as a form of control over one’s actions, debated through questions like whether we can “do otherwise” or possess self-determination (O’Connor & Franklin, 2002).
From a neuroscientific lens, free will is linked to brain processes. Libet’s (1983) experiments suggested that neural activity precedes conscious awareness of decisions, challenging the notion that consciousness initiates action. Yet, newer research proposes free will as a “capacity” for reasoned choice, measurable through neural correlates of agency (Lavazza, 2016).
Metaphysically, free will intersects with determinism—the idea that all events are caused. Spinoza argued that true freedom arises when our actions align with rational understanding of reality, not from escaping determinism but from embracing it consciously (Spinoza, 1677/1992). Esoteric traditions, such as Theosophy, view free will as an expression of the soul’s divine spark, navigating a cosmos of interconnected energies (Blavatsky, 1888).
Spiritually, free will is often seen as a gift from a higher power or an inherent quality of consciousness. In Eastern philosophies, like Advaita Vedanta, free will is an illusion at the egoic level but real in the context of the higher self’s unity with the absolute (Chakrabarti, 2017). These perspectives converge on a core idea: free will is about agency, choice, and the interplay of individual and universal forces.
3. The Mechanics of Free Will: How Does It Work?
The mechanics of free will involve cognitive, neural, and metaphysical processes. In neuroscience, free will operates through a dynamic interplay of conscious and unconscious brain activity. The prefrontal cortex, responsible for decision-making, integrates sensory inputs, emotions, and reasoning to produce choices (Haggard, 2010). Studies suggest that while unconscious processes may initiate actions, conscious veto power allows individuals to override impulses, preserving a degree of control (Libet, 1985).
Philosophically, free will’s mechanics hinge on the “ability to do otherwise” and “control over choices” (Lavazza, 2016). Frankfurt-style cases, where an agent is responsible despite lacking alternative options, suggest that moral responsibility—and thus free will—depends on alignment with one’s values, not just the presence of alternatives (Frankfurt, 1969).
In esoteric traditions, free will operates within a framework of cosmic laws. The Hermetic principle of cause and effect suggests that choices ripple through interconnected realities, influenced by but not wholly determined by spiritual forces (Three Initiates, 1912). Similarly, spiritual texts like the Bhagavad Gita frame free will as the soul’s capacity to choose between dharma (duty) and adharma (chaos), guided by divine wisdom (Easwaran, 2007).
These mechanics reveal free will as a layered process: neural systems enable decision-making, philosophical frameworks define its scope, and metaphysical perspectives place it within a broader cosmic order. Free will is not absolute freedom but a capacity to act intentionally within constraints.
4. The Purpose and Origin of Free Will
Why does free will exist, and who or what created it? Philosophers like Kant (1797/1967) argue that free will’s purpose is to enable moral responsibility, allowing humans to act according to rational principles (Kant, 1797/1967). From a social perspective, free will fosters cooperation and long-term planning, overriding selfish impulses for the collective good (Baumeister, 2008).
Metaphysically, free will’s origin is often tied to a divine or cosmic source. In Judeo-Christian traditions, God grants free will to enable moral choices, aligning with divine purpose (Augustine, 400/1998). Esoteric philosophies, like those of the Theosophical Society, posit that free will emerges from the soul’s evolution within a universe of divine intelligence (Blavatsky, 1888). In nondual traditions, free will arises from consciousness itself, an expression of the infinite potential within the absolute reality (Shankara, 8th century/1975).
Scientifically, free will may have evolved to enhance survival. The ability to weigh options and act deliberately likely gave early humans an adaptive edge in complex social environments (Baumeister, 2005). Thus, free will’s purpose spans moral agency, social harmony, spiritual growth, and evolutionary advantage, with origins rooted in divine, cosmic, or biological processes.
5. Navigating Life Without Full Knowledge of Free Will
How do we live meaningfully when free will’s nature remains elusive? The uncertainty surrounding free will—whether it’s an illusion, a neural process, or a divine gift—doesn’t paralyze action. Instead, it invites a pragmatic approach. Existentialist philosophers like Sartre (1943/2005) argue that we must act as if we are free, embracing responsibility for our choices regardless of metaphysical truths.
Practically, navigating life involves balancing intuition and reason. Cognitive science suggests that humans rely on heuristics—mental shortcuts—to make decisions under uncertainty (Kahneman, 2011). Spiritually, practices like mindfulness, drawn from Buddhist traditions, help individuals align choices with inner values, fostering a sense of agency (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Esoteric teachings, such as those in the Kybalion, emphasize mental discipline to master one’s choices within cosmic laws (Three Initiates, 1912).
By focusing on intention and reflection, individuals can navigate life’s uncertainties. Journaling, meditation, or ethical frameworks like utilitarianism guide decision-making, ensuring choices align with personal and collective well-being, even without full clarity on free will’s mechanics.
6. Influencing Others as Sovereign Souls
As parents, leaders, or officials, influencing others while respecting their free will is a delicate balance. Each person is a sovereign soul, possessing their own agency, yet interconnected in a web of relationships. Psychological research on influence highlights persuasion, modeling, and empathy as key tools (Cialdini, 2001). For example, parents shape children’s values through example and dialogue, fostering autonomy while guiding behavior.
Leadership theories emphasize transformational approaches, where leaders inspire rather than coerce, aligning followers’ goals with a shared vision (Bass, 1990). Government officials can influence through policies that incentivize ethical behavior without undermining choice, such as nudging strategies (Thaler & Sunstein, 2008). In business, ethical marketing respects consumer autonomy by providing transparent information rather than manipulative tactics.
Spiritual traditions offer further insight. The Bhagavad Gita advises acting with detachment, guiding others without attachment to outcomes, thus honoring their free will (Easwaran, 2007). Esoteric teachings, like those of Rudolf Steiner, suggest that influence should cultivate spiritual growth, encouraging others to align with their higher selves (Steiner, 1925/1995).
7. Building a Harmonious Society: Balancing Free Will and Collective Good
A harmonious society respects individual free will while fostering collective well-being. Philosophical theories like social contract theory propose that individuals surrender some freedoms for mutual benefit, creating a balance between autonomy and cooperation (Rousseau, 1762/1968). Religious pluralism, as explored by Muslim perennialists, suggests that diverse beliefs can coexist through shared esoteric truths, reducing conflict (Soleha & Rahmawatib, 2020).
Practically, policies that promote education, dialogue, and restorative justice—rather than punitive measures—encourage mutual respect. Restorative justice, for instance, focuses on repairing harm through collaboration, aligning with the principle of respecting others’ agency (Zehr, 1990).
Esoteric traditions emphasize interconnectedness. Theosophy teaches that all souls are part of a universal whole, so harmonious societies arise when individuals act with compassion and awareness of their impact (Blavatsky, 1888). Similarly, spiritual practices like loving-kindness meditation cultivate empathy, reducing conflicts and fostering peace (Salzberg, 1995).
8. Global Awakening: Are We Recognizing the Truth of Free Will?
The global trend of “awakening”—a rise in spiritual, intellectual, and ecological awareness—suggests humanity is grappling with questions of agency and purpose. Social media platforms like X highlight discussions on consciousness, sovereignty, and collective evolution, reflecting a growing interest in free will’s implications (trending on X). New Age movements, rooted in Theosophy and esoteric thought, frame awakening as embodying the “higher self,” where free will aligns with universal harmony (In5D, 2016).
Empirical data supports this trend. Surveys show increasing interest in mindfulness, spirituality, and ethical living, particularly among younger generations (Pew Research Center, 2020). Philosophically, this aligns with Dennett’s (2003) view that free will is valuable when it enables pursuit of meaningful goals. Spiritually, texts like the Upanishads suggest that awakening involves recognizing the unity of individual and cosmic will (Easwaran, 2007).
This awakening may signal a deeper understanding of free will as a tool for ethical agency and interconnectedness, driving humanity toward cooperation and compassion.
9. Conclusion
Free will is a multifaceted phenomenon, weaving together neural processes, philosophical principles, metaphysical truths, and spiritual insights. It empowers us to make choices, bear responsibility, and shape our lives within a web of constraints and possibilities. Its mechanics involve conscious and unconscious processes, its purpose spans moral agency and social harmony, and its origins lie in divine, cosmic, or evolutionary forces.
Navigating life without fully knowing free will requires intention, reflection, and ethical frameworks. Influencing others as sovereign souls demands empathy and respect, while a harmonious society balances individual autonomy with collective good. The global awakening suggests humanity is increasingly attuned to free will’s truth, fostering a future of compassionate coexistence.
This dissertation invites readers to reflect on their own agency and its role in building a connected, awakened world. By embracing free will’s complexity, we can navigate life with purpose and contribute to a society where all souls thrive.
Crosslinks
- Codex of Sovereignty: The Soul’s Inalienable Freedom — Establishes the foundation of free will as an Oversoul right, inseparable from sovereignty.
- Universal Master Key: The Seal that Governs All Gates — Reveals how free will operates within higher laws, balancing choice with divine alignment.
- Understanding Cosmic Laws: A Guide to Easing Suffering and Uniting Humanity — Frames free will not as chaos, but as harmony with universal principles.
- The Veil of Forgetting: Unraveling the Purpose of Reincarnation and the Illusion of Duality — Explains why souls choose to forget, making free will the pivot point of remembrance.
- Constellations of Awakening — Shows how individual free will choices ripple into collective constellations of remembrance.
- Codex of Stewardship: Holding in Trust the Wealth of Worlds — Extends free will into responsibility for resources, nodes, and planetary guardianship.
- Resonance Metrics as a Spiritual Compass in Times of Uncertainty — Offers a way to measure when free will is aligned with Oversoul vs. distorted by illusion.
10. Glossary
- Agency: The capacity to act intentionally and make choices.
- Determinism: The view that all events are caused by prior conditions, potentially limiting free will.
- Esotericism: Spiritual traditions emphasizing hidden or exclusive knowledge, often tied to mysticism.
- Free Will: The ability to make choices free from certain constraints, enabling moral responsibility.
- Higher Self: In spiritual traditions, the divine or enlightened aspect of an individual’s consciousness.
- Metaphysics: The branch of philosophy exploring the nature of reality, being, and causality.
- Perennialism: A philosophy asserting that all religious traditions share a universal spiritual truth.
- Sovereign Soul: An individual’s autonomous, spiritual essence, capable of free choice.
11. Bibliography
Augustine. (1998). The City of God (R. W. Dyson, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 400)
Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.
Blavatsky, H. P. (1888). The Secret Doctrine. Theosophical Publishing House.
Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Dennett, D. C. (2003). Freedom evolves. Viking Press.
Easwaran, E. (2007). The Bhagavad Gita (2nd ed.). Nilgiri Press.
Feldman, G. (2017). Making sense of agency: Belief in free will as a unique and important construct. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(1), e12293.
Frankfurt, H. G. (1969). Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. The Journal of Philosophy, 66(23), 829–839.
Haggard, P., Mele, A., O’Connor, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2010). Free will and neuroscience. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(3), 419–429.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Delacorte Press.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kant, I. (1967). Critique of practical reason (L. W. Beck, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1797)
Lavazza, A. (2016). Free will and neuroscience: From explaining freedom away to new ways of operationalizing and measuring it. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 262.
Libet, B. (1983). The neural time factor in conscious and unconscious mental events. Science, 219(4586), 1047–1052.
Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(4), 529–566.
O’Connor, T., & Franklin, C. (2002). Free will. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1968). The social contract (M. Cranston, Trans.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1762)
Salzberg, S. (1995). Lovingkindness: The revolutionary art of happiness. Shambhala.
Sartre, J.-P. (2005). Being and nothingness (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1943)
Shankara. (1975). Brahma Sutra Bhashya (G. Thibaut, Trans.). Motilal Banarsidass. (Original work 8th century)
Soleha, S., & Rahmawatib, R. (2020). Principles of religious pluralism. MDPI Journal of Religion, 10(12), 1–15.
Spinoza, B. (1992). Ethics (S. Shirley, Trans.). Hackett Publishing. (Original work published 1677)
Steiner, R. (1995). Intuitive thinking as a spiritual path (M. Lipson, Trans.). Anthroposophic Press. (Original work published 1925)
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
Three Initiates. (1912). The Kybalion: A study of the Hermetic philosophy of ancient Egypt and Greece. Yogi Publication Society.
Zehr, H. (1990). Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice. Herald Press.
Attribution
This writing is offered in attunement with the Akashic Records and in service to planetary remembrance. It is carried through the Oversoul stream of SHEYALOTH and anchored within the Living Archives of the New Earth. May it serve as a bridge for seekers, guiding them from the first stirrings of awakening toward the higher codices of sovereignty, stewardship, and overflow.
© 2025 by Gerald Alba Daquila. Sole Flameholder of the SHEYALOTH Oversoul Stream.



What stirred your remembrance? Share your reflection below—we’re weaving the New Earth together, one soul voice at a time.